This is yet another
one of those books I meant to read when it came out (in 2009), but have only
just managed to. Still, better late than never. Having finally read it, I can
also now allow myself to watch the film, and having seen the trailer I’m curious
to try out two hours or Anne Hathaway’s poor attempts at a Yorkshire accent. It
also apparently has a few scenes filmed in Cubana, the greatest cocktail bar (
/ restaurant, but I’ve actually never eaten there) in London, which I find more
exciting than I should. But anyway, in a brief introduction it’s a novel that
spans twenty years, each chapter picking up on the exact same day of every
year, exploring the lives and relationship of two people, Emma and Dexter.
It reminded me (for
at least a great part of the novel), of Celhia Anhern’s Where Rainbows End. The premise is fairly similar – the man and woman whose
relationship teeters on the borderline between friendship and love, both
stretching over a long time – Where
Rainbows End covers over forty years I think, and One Day covers about twenty. Both novels have a very different, but
equally out-of-the-norm structure, with Where
Rainbows End being an epistolary novel and One Day showing the lives of two individuals on the same day each
year. It’s a curious feature of the publishing world that if you looked at the
front covers of these two novels you would probably expect them to be
completely different. For example:
Apparently earlier
this year Jodi Picoult said:
If a woman had written One Day, it would have been [sold as]
airport fiction
I think she has a
slight point. There’s a little angry part of me that is fairly sure that, had One Day had a female author, the writing
on the cover would have been as curly as the writing on the cover of Where Rainbows End. But let’s move on
before I get cross.
I like One Day (up to a point – a very specific
point that I will get onto later). In the end, even though I think David
Nicholls shows far greater skill as a writer, as a novel I do think I probably
prefer Where Rainbows End, but
there’s still much to be said for One
Day. I really like the structure. I enjoy novels that try to do something
other than the traditional linear narrative, that play with form, and Nicholls
does it quite effectively here.
It is generally
pretty written well, especially the dialogue, which is particularly strong
between Emma and Dexter. Sure, it is at times atrociously cheesy, but so are a
lot of books, and I can just about live with that. Besides, I enjoy that at
least some of the cheesiness is undermined (for example: ‘you’re gorgeous, you
old hag, and if I could give you just one gift ever for the rest of your life
it would be this. Confidence… Either that or a scented candle.’) At times the
novel is very funny (Emma especially), and the book is mostly engaging. I read
the majority of it on a four and a half hour train journey, and didn’t year
bored – which is probably a good sign.
The characterisation
of the two main characters is strong. I really like Emma, and I think Dexter is
changes over the novel are very effective. Even when you don’t like him you
find him believable, which is more important. You can perfectly understand how
Emma could love him and not like him all at once. I think their characters are
done very well, and all are the more impressive considering the fact that the
novel spans twenty years, and that no one remains the same over such a period
of time. I thought their character development, especially Dexter’s, was done
well.
It was the minor
characters who fell short a bit. I found this with Where Rainbows End and Eleanor& Park as well (much as I liked both of them), so perhaps romances always have this problem – that the
two central characters are fully developed into human beings and the side
characters remain nothing but side characters. This always annoys me. Just
because the novel isn’t about them, doesn’t mean they shouldn’t feel as real
(if not necessarily as interesting) as the central figures. Dexter’s parents
seem interesting, but are never fully explored. Ian feels like a stereotype, as
does Suki Meadows. Sylvie is underdeveloped. I couldn’t quite make her out –
and not in a good way.
However, I could have
forgiven this had it not been for the ending (surprise, surprise). I really
loved One Day – until page 385. The
ending was a let-down to me. It wasn’t moving or effective because it just felt
like a cop-out to me.
Still, I will say
in the defence of Nicholls that this bad ending was handled well, strange as
that sounds. Although I did not like the plotted ending, I thought the structure
of the ending worked well.
Still, even though I
was disappointed, I think I’m glad I read it. Possibly. It is a well-written
and good book with an ending that irritated me. There are rather a lot of them
out there.
Greatest
strength: The
characterisation of Emma and Dexter – and the novel’s structure.
Greatest
weakness: The
ending.
Let’s
finish on a quote:
I want my best friend back, she thinks, because without him
nothing is good and nothing is right.
Yes,
definitely cheesy.
Next week: Paper Towns, by John Green
No comments:
Post a comment