Disclaimer: I still
know nothing about writing book reviews.
This problem of mine is made worse by my decision to pick, for my second review, so flawless a novel as this.
Published last year,
Nathan Filer’s book The Shock of the Fall
tells the story of a young man, Matthew Homes, coming to term with the death of
his brother ten years earlier. It’s a book about mental illness, family and
grief. It’s also a book about writing books. And I loved it.
I’ll give you three
main reasons why, which handily separate into the three things I usually judge
books by:
1. Form: This might seem a bit of a
strange one, but I’m a big fan of form. There are so many more things that can
be done with writing novels than just a linear narrative in Times New Roman,
where every page looks the same. I really enjoyed The Shock of the Fall’s use of form, and the purposes form is put
to (because I’m less of a fan of experimental form just for the sake of it). It’s
been compared to Mark Haddon’s The
Curious Incident of a Dog in the Night-Time, and I can see why. Both make
use of images, diagrams, different fonts, etc, and are self-conscious about how
chapters are named or numbered. This is my kind of postmodernism, because it
shows novels to be what they are: creations.
I like that you can
tell by the font of Matthew’s story whether he’s typing it on the computer at
Hope Street Day Centre or on his typewriter at home. I like that we get to see
his sketches alongside his words. I like that he talks about writing, that he’s
sometimes interrupted by the care workers looking over his shoulder. I like
that the very act of writing is central to the book, because the very writing
of the story helps Matthew to recover. The
Shock of the Fall makes writing not only a process, an action, but also a
form of therapy.
2. Writing: The
Shock of the Fall is
one of those books where the writing is well-crafted but never over-crafted. Unlike
The Professor of Poetry (see my last review),
which I found overpowering and clumsy in its sheer poetic-ness, The Shock of the Fall is beautifully
written without ever being difficult to read (linguistically, I mean; I’ll get
on to how it was to read emotionally shortly). It has a lot of incredible
sentences and various amazing similes, but they never feel unnatural. It read
like something the protagonist Matthew might have actually written.
The
characters are brilliantly drawn. Little details like the family tradition of
watching Eastenders, sitting in the same places every night, or Matthew and his
Dad’s secret handshake, bring them to life. Matthew is well-formed, realistic,
complex and conflicted – everything a strong protagonist should be. The blame
he feels for his brother’s death and all the pain it causes him are
realistically and poignantly expressed. Matthew’s mother is also an incredible
creation. She is somehow always both on the edge of Matthew’s understanding and
yet within ours.
3. Content: As I’ve already said, The Shock of the Fall is a book about
mental illness. It’s a book about a lot of other things as well, but this
dominates, and is important, because people, and novels, don’t talk about
mental illness enough. While a lot of novels do deal with depression, especially
with what it feels like, far fewer tackle what it’s like to live in the
psychiatric ward of a hospital, or to be treated with care in the community.
This does, and it does so not by making Matthew a victim or a hero but by making
him human.
So I thoroughly recommend you to read The Shock of the Fall.
I’m
not saying that it’s not at times an unsettling and upsetting book. This is not
a novel to take on holiday with you if you want a light happy read – but I
count that as a point in its favour. At times I genuinely had to put my kindle
down and stare out the window for a moment just to remind myself of reality.
But what The Shock of the Fall is is
a very honest and touching account of a family coming to terms with grief, and
of a young man suffering from depression and schizophrenia. So yes, it is
unsettling, but it is also funny, engaging, and brilliantly beautiful.
Greatest
strength: The
sheer humanity of the characters.
Greatest
weakness: I
promise I’ll be critical next time, but I honestly can think of nothing
negative to say about The Shock of the
Fall.
Let’s
finish on a quote:
I
have one chance to get this right. I need to be careful. To unfold everything
neatly, so that I know how to fold it away again if it all gets too much.
Now that’s what I
call good writing.
Next
time: The
Hundred-Year-Old Man Who Climbed Out of the Window and Disappeared, by Jonas
Jonasson
No comments:
Post a comment